AUDVERA · START WHERE THE AUDIT STARTS

What audit are you running?

Describe the audit and receive a starting risk assessment for review. We'll email you a secure link that opens your engagement draft in Audvera and starts a 14-day trial — no credit card.

Try:

The assessment is free. Design-partner pilot access is scoped separately.

By submitting, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Controlled design-partner pilot

One focused testing workflow across two audit work areas.

The pilot applies the same evidence, analysis, workpaper, and independent-review contracts to selected Engagement procedures and Controls tests where the audit work is equivalent.

Technique-specific result views can differ when the underlying audit work differs.

Work area 1

Engagement procedures

  • Open an assigned test procedure from My Work
  • Review its objective, criteria, and explicitly linked responses
  • Add or select eligible CSV or XLSX evidence
  • Run one supported analysis recipe
  • Review technique-aware results and source anchors
  • Prepare the workpaper for an independent reviewer

Work area 2

Controls tests

  • Open an assigned Controls test from My Work
  • Review the control, objective, attributes, and linked context
  • Add or select eligible CSV or XLSX evidence
  • Run one supported analysis recipe
  • Review tested items, exceptions, citations, and conclusion
  • Prepare the workpaper for an independent reviewer

The supported pilot path

Evidence testing that shows its basis and keeps judgment human.

Design partners evaluate a selected procedure from setup through supported analysis, technique-aware result review, conclusion, and independent signoff. The pilot stays inside this bounded workflow.

Verify before run

Eligible evidence is extracted and attributed verification is required before supported analysis can run.

Inspect what was used

Coverage and source anchors show the inputs and locations recorded for the run.

Keep judgment human

AI-assisted results remain attributed drafts until a preparer and an independent reviewer complete their work.

Focused pilot workflow

See the evidence-to-review path.

This is the supported design-partner path for a selected procedure or control test. It covers only this bounded evidence, results, judgment, and review flow.

Step 1 of 4

Set up

Review the procedure objective, criteria, and explicitly linked context.

Starts from

Assigned procedure

Selected procedure

Auditor controlled

Termination deprovisioning timeliness

Objective

Defined

Criteria

3 checks

Linked responses

2 captured

What the pilot is designed to prove

The value is not an AI paragraph. It is reviewable audit work.

The controlled pilot tests whether verified inputs, source-aware draft results, auditor judgment, and independent review can make one real procedure easier to perform and defend.

1 procedure

Focused proof

Start with a selected Engagement procedure or Controls test instead of promising a broad transformation before the workflow is proven.

Recorded inputs

Visible basis

Review the evidence coverage and source anchors recorded for the supported analysis run.

2 people

Independent review

A preparer records judgment and a different reviewer returns or approves the immutable workpaper revision.

The field's blind spots

Most audit AI pages ignore the work CAEs get blamed for.

The risk isn't whether AI drafts a paragraph. It's whether the team can defend coverage, source decisions, and prove review before the audit committee asks.

They sell a prompt box.

A prompt box cannot carry audit accountability. The pilot evaluates AI assistance inside a selected procedure, with recorded evidence inputs and explicit human review.

They make teams upload evidence twice.

Linked Data Request and Interview responses can be captured once and reused by the procedures that explicitly reference them.

They hide the judgment trail.

AI can draft, but a CAE has to defend who accepted the work. Audvera records review gates, changes, comments, and signoff where the work happens.

They promise the entire platform at once.

Audvera is starting with a controlled design-partner pilot focused on selected evidence testing, workpaper review, and independent signoff.

From assessment to pilot

Prove one customer workflow before expanding the promise.

A design-partner pilot begins only after the procedure, evidence, supported recipe, participants, and limitations are agreed.

01

Start with your audit context.

Generate a starting risk assessment, then discuss whether one selected Engagement procedure or Controls test fits the design-partner pilot.

02

Agree on the test and roles.

Define the procedure, supported analysis recipe, evidence format, preparer, and independent reviewer before pilot work begins.

03

Run with verified evidence.

Use eligible CSV or XLSX evidence, inspect the extraction, complete attributed verification, and run a supported analysis recipe.

04

Review the work independently.

Inspect tested items, exceptions, coverage, and source anchors. The preparer records judgment and a different reviewer returns or approves the work.

Choose the next step

Start with an assessment. Pilot one supported workflow.

The public assessment is available now. Product access for Program A is a controlled design-partner pilot with a narrow, agreed scope and hands-on support.

Generate a starting risk assessment.

Describe the audit context and receive an AI-generated starting assessment for review. This assessment does not establish a final audit conclusion.

  • Use your own industry, framework, scope, and known risks
  • Review the generated assessment before relying on it
  • Continue the conversation without promising product access

Discuss a design-partner pilot.

The pilot is for a small, named team willing to evaluate one selected evidence-testing and workpaper-review workflow within the frozen support boundary.

  • One isolated tenant for the design partner
  • Eligible CSV or XLSX evidence and supported recipes only
  • Mandatory preparer and independent-reviewer participation

Buyer's committee

Answer objections before they become delay.

For CAEs, the real risk is not whether the demo looks clever. It is whether the system can improve audit work without weakening professional judgment.

Will auditors keep control?+

Yes. AI-assisted output is attributed draft work. Human review and independent signoff remain mandatory.

What evidence can the pilot use?+

The frozen pilot supports manual CSV and XLSX uploads that pass server extraction eligibility and attributed verification.

What work is included?+

The pilot focuses on selected Engagement procedures and Controls tests using the supported evidence, analysis, review, and signoff flow.

Is this a full platform rollout?+

No. It is a controlled design-partner pilot with a narrow, disclosed scope and hands-on support.

Test one real audit workflow with clear boundaries.

Start with an assessment, then discuss a controlled design-partner pilot for one selected procedure and its evidence, results, judgment, and independent review.